New laws may “protect” but not “serve” the consumers best interest

The economy is in the tank and Americans are suffering.  It’s a natural response for the government to step in to “help”.  Last year we saw bail-outs, takeovers, and new laws all in an attempt to help stop a big problem from getting worse.   Some were probably necessary but others maybe not. 

Look at the new credit card laws.  There is no argument that Credit Card companies have been taking advantage of consumers for years.  But in the days when credit was plentiful and interest rates were low, no one really seemed to care.  It only got ugly when the economy tanked and large banking institutions started to look for ways to minimize their losses (at the expense of their credit card customers).  Banks that were losing millions in foreclosures could make up some of the loss by raising interest rates, increasing late fees, and doubling the minimum payments due.   But at what cost?   Most card issuers didn’t have to give the consumer much notice before changing these terms and therefore it took a lot of Americans off-guard and placed them in a bad financial situation.

The President, in an effort to stop consumers from being taken advantage of, signed a new law that will force the card issuers to give consumers more notice before changing terms.  In response, most credit card companies have already raised rates, increased fees and changed terms BEFORE the new law goes into effect.  And these banks have not just penalized borrowers with bad payment history--almost everyone was hit and many have even had their cards cancelled without warning further hurting their financial situation.

But this is probably just the beginning.  In the future we will most likely see all credit cards come with stiffer terms and gone are the days when you could hop from one 2.9% offer to another.  It’s likely as well that most banks will go back to cards with annual fees and offer fewer perks to customers who use their cards frequently.  In fact, a study by Synovate, a market research firm, found that U.S. households are already receiving dramatically fewer card offers in the mail.

Hopefully in the end, it will all even out but I would rather see the consumer have the option to have a card with high fees, low fees, or whatever perks are offered rather than to see the credit market so tight that you have to “take what you can get”.   Sometimes regulations end up hurting the very people they are designed to help.